This morning I had fun in the office to see what would increase the tax rates within the various bands for which income tax rates change and the result, as is imagined, is disturbing:
Gross Revenue / tax / previous financial 2007/differenza taxation between tax regime and the previous fiscal 2007 financial / increase in the marginal
Gross Revenue / tax / previous financial 2007/differenza taxation between tax regime and the previous fiscal 2007 financial / increase in the marginal
15000 / 3450 / 3450 / +0 / + 0% ( gross income)
20000 / 4600 / 4800 / +200 / +1.00%
25000 / 5750 / 6150 / +400 / +1.60%
25000 / 5750 / 6150 / +400 / +1.60%
30000 / 7300 / 7720 / +420 / +1.40
% 35000 / 9040 / 9620 / +580 / +1.66%
40000 / 10990 / 11520 / +530 / +1.32%
45000 / 12940 / 13420 / +480 / +1.06%
50000 / 14890 / 15320 / +430 / +0.86%
55000 / 16840 / 17220 / +380 / +0.69%
60000 / 18790 / 19270 / +480 / +0.80%
65000 / 20740 / 21320 / +580 / +0.89%
70000 / 22690 / 23370 / +680 / +0.97%
75000 / 24640 / 25420 / +780 / +1.04%
disturbing because looking at the numbers makes me wonder: who is who should benefit from this new in 2007 Budget The financial equity and income redistribution?
Well, two accounts of the servant on paper cheese (I used excel agree, it's easier!) Tell me that anyone with a gross annual income from more than 15 000 euro loses something. The something is more substantial than that for the income groups shown in the table.
The debate in the press has focused on income above € 75 000 for which the rate will reach 43%, which is really a drain, it seems, however, and I think a little interest at all, the increase will not only affects them but also those who certainly can not count among the middle class, unless you have an idea of \u200b\u200bthis class of very broad and not related to the Italian.
Prodi and Padoa Schioppa tear their garments in saying that the promises were kept and the 2007 Budget pursues social equity, but I can not be clear who will benefit di tale presunta equità. Dimostrato, numeri alla mano, che non ne beneficia chi ha un reddito lordo superiore a 20 mila euro, so per certo che è stata aumentata la no tax area da 250 a 500 euro. Bene, ne sono davvero felice, ma siamo sicuri che cotanto sforzo (a mio parere senza dubbio utile e forse doveroso) non potessero essere raggiunto in altro modo? Tanto più che per tutti (e quindi non solo per il cosiddetto ceto medio estendibile come dimostrato a redditi a dir poco bassini) e quindi anche per i “poveri” vi sarà l’aumento del ticket, l’aggravio della tassazione sulle rendite finanziarie (e quindi, anche sui titoli di stato notoriamente acquistati non da chi ha un grosso patrimonio, il quale generalmente si affida alla gestione individuale da parte di investitori specializzati che non acquistano certo bot, ma da chi ha qualche risparmio in banca), i tagli ai trasferimenti dallo stato ai comuni e alle regioni i quali, per far fronte alla spesa faranno leva sulle imposte da loero controllate, l’aumento dell’imposta di registro per il trasferimento di una casa anche da padre a figlio, l’aumento dell’imposta sulle donazioni e, infine, ricordando l’elevata percentuale di possessori di casa in Italia, l’impatto di sicuro aumento dell’ICI a fronte del trasferimento del catasto ai comuni che aggiorneranno le stime.
Dove risiede la compensazione a tutto ciò? Solo sull’innalzamento della no tax area? Really does seem a little 'bit.
Some say that with the new Budget, the deductions are being replaced by deductions, which, acting directly on the amount payable and not on the positive so they decreed a net benefit for those with dependents. Ben is the deduction, even though I have strong doubts net effect of all these tax benefits and certain hypothetical and this in fact seems to me noteworthy negative.
The uncertainty does not benefit in economy, ever, and as I got to say, do not know what to expect makes it impossible to make plans for the future or to individuals, resulting in an increasing level of consumption, or to companies who will have difficulty in planning investments, and then development (the uncertainty created by the Finance Companies I got to say ).
disturbing because looking at the numbers makes me wonder: who is who should benefit from this new in 2007 Budget The financial equity and income redistribution?
Well, two accounts of the servant on paper cheese (I used excel agree, it's easier!) Tell me that anyone with a gross annual income from more than 15 000 euro loses something. The something is more substantial than that for the income groups shown in the table.
The debate in the press has focused on income above € 75 000 for which the rate will reach 43%, which is really a drain, it seems, however, and I think a little interest at all, the increase will not only affects them but also those who certainly can not count among the middle class, unless you have an idea of \u200b\u200bthis class of very broad and not related to the Italian.
Prodi and Padoa Schioppa tear their garments in saying that the promises were kept and the 2007 Budget pursues social equity, but I can not be clear who will benefit di tale presunta equità. Dimostrato, numeri alla mano, che non ne beneficia chi ha un reddito lordo superiore a 20 mila euro, so per certo che è stata aumentata la no tax area da 250 a 500 euro. Bene, ne sono davvero felice, ma siamo sicuri che cotanto sforzo (a mio parere senza dubbio utile e forse doveroso) non potessero essere raggiunto in altro modo? Tanto più che per tutti (e quindi non solo per il cosiddetto ceto medio estendibile come dimostrato a redditi a dir poco bassini) e quindi anche per i “poveri” vi sarà l’aumento del ticket, l’aggravio della tassazione sulle rendite finanziarie (e quindi, anche sui titoli di stato notoriamente acquistati non da chi ha un grosso patrimonio, il quale generalmente si affida alla gestione individuale da parte di investitori specializzati che non acquistano certo bot, ma da chi ha qualche risparmio in banca), i tagli ai trasferimenti dallo stato ai comuni e alle regioni i quali, per far fronte alla spesa faranno leva sulle imposte da loero controllate, l’aumento dell’imposta di registro per il trasferimento di una casa anche da padre a figlio, l’aumento dell’imposta sulle donazioni e, infine, ricordando l’elevata percentuale di possessori di casa in Italia, l’impatto di sicuro aumento dell’ICI a fronte del trasferimento del catasto ai comuni che aggiorneranno le stime.
Dove risiede la compensazione a tutto ciò? Solo sull’innalzamento della no tax area? Really does seem a little 'bit.
Some say that with the new Budget, the deductions are being replaced by deductions, which, acting directly on the amount payable and not on the positive so they decreed a net benefit for those with dependents. Ben is the deduction, even though I have strong doubts net effect of all these tax benefits and certain hypothetical and this in fact seems to me noteworthy negative.
The uncertainty does not benefit in economy, ever, and as I got to say, do not know what to expect makes it impossible to make plans for the future or to individuals, resulting in an increasing level of consumption, or to companies who will have difficulty in planning investments, and then development (the uncertainty created by the Finance Companies I got to say ).
0 comments:
Post a Comment