I must admit, these days the financial and the impact of size but of uncertain sign (negative) on some people and the country, it's my dominant thought. In his company there I wake up in the morning, evening the last lucid, sometimes also arrives in the dream, or anxious about to catch me by surprise as much and only dreams they do: this time the surprise came from watching a demonstration so large as to contain all the flags of all parties who have in essence a single breath of liberalism, whether right or left ... I participated and watched amazed such participation for the 'common objective of a liberal character in this budget, with that feeling in the stomach that you can only have when you believe to be participating in an event that could be described as historic.
Yeah I know sometimes I leave well permeated by doing good, especially in the numbness enveloping dream. But if the feeling of the dream is particularly beautiful, as was the case tonight, it remains even today so the next day and gives me hope that this situation can also occur in the real world: overcoming the many differences before the end, cuts across all 'belonging to different parties, to prevent the implementation of this budget, which brings with it the clear statement of the role of the state tax on top of everything and everybody, as an entity in itself, independent of the wishes and needs of citizens, independent of the efficiency of the services which should provide themselves, which have the right and duty to intervene in some way when that level is not more optimal (far from it before, but now the perception of the state interventionist and decisive even on people's aesthetic taste is awesome with a force). Then I read that
Capezzone proposes the formation of a cross table of the willing that make a significant change in the financial proposal and it seems almost a dream come true, that the situation is so untenable that urges coordination that goes beyond despite the important differences ... still probably the wake-dream effect, for which the most absurd things seem possible, they are led to believe that the absurdity of this makes real financial understanding, by an increasingly large number of people, a mammoth was not a need to feel good, especially if the government in power clearly does not use it for this purpose and it is not an incontrovertible truth: the way to achieve the parameters Europeans do not necessarily increase the tax burden is already quite high. Because otherwise this was a sure proof of the inefficiency of the state apparatus that continues to require no little or nothing to give, an apparatus that good and accountable governance at this point expected to improve in a structural way.
If all this is accompanied by the lies on the fiscal position of the government and economy minister which, contradicting, in parliament argues that Tremonti has left us a legacy and malignant the foreign press that instead the last financial Tremonti was very strict, the situation should be considered unsustainable by any citizen who has been his awareness that if the state should (?) stay heavy, at least not serious about them.
In this regard it should be noted that the "terrible" Berlusconi government, which increased government spending and this is certainly to be applauded, and at least in a situation of economic recession, has managed to reduce their taxes by about 2 percentage points, leaving a legacy to center-left not the painful situation which is described liar, but even more revenue (for another showing that the increase in revenue does not necessarily pass through the fight against tax evasion, but also by reducing the tax burden, making it less convenient to use evasion, which has social costs but also real) economy and a slight recovery. It is required to harass citizens with higher taxes when a sufficient structural intervention on public spending? And if you really can not act alone in this sense because the stakes are too many, not least the sacrifice should be required of all apparatus and therefore state? If only for the well-publicized equity.
If the sacrifices go in one direction, then it should be clear to all, with disarming clarity of a dream, both right and left, which requires the clear manifestation of our discontent.
Yeah I know sometimes I leave well permeated by doing good, especially in the numbness enveloping dream. But if the feeling of the dream is particularly beautiful, as was the case tonight, it remains even today so the next day and gives me hope that this situation can also occur in the real world: overcoming the many differences before the end, cuts across all 'belonging to different parties, to prevent the implementation of this budget, which brings with it the clear statement of the role of the state tax on top of everything and everybody, as an entity in itself, independent of the wishes and needs of citizens, independent of the efficiency of the services which should provide themselves, which have the right and duty to intervene in some way when that level is not more optimal (far from it before, but now the perception of the state interventionist and decisive even on people's aesthetic taste is awesome with a force). Then I read that
Capezzone proposes the formation of a cross table of the willing that make a significant change in the financial proposal and it seems almost a dream come true, that the situation is so untenable that urges coordination that goes beyond despite the important differences ... still probably the wake-dream effect, for which the most absurd things seem possible, they are led to believe that the absurdity of this makes real financial understanding, by an increasingly large number of people, a mammoth was not a need to feel good, especially if the government in power clearly does not use it for this purpose and it is not an incontrovertible truth: the way to achieve the parameters Europeans do not necessarily increase the tax burden is already quite high. Because otherwise this was a sure proof of the inefficiency of the state apparatus that continues to require no little or nothing to give, an apparatus that good and accountable governance at this point expected to improve in a structural way.
If all this is accompanied by the lies on the fiscal position of the government and economy minister which, contradicting, in parliament argues that Tremonti has left us a legacy and malignant the foreign press that instead the last financial Tremonti was very strict, the situation should be considered unsustainable by any citizen who has been his awareness that if the state should (?) stay heavy, at least not serious about them.
In this regard it should be noted that the "terrible" Berlusconi government, which increased government spending and this is certainly to be applauded, and at least in a situation of economic recession, has managed to reduce their taxes by about 2 percentage points, leaving a legacy to center-left not the painful situation which is described liar, but even more revenue (for another showing that the increase in revenue does not necessarily pass through the fight against tax evasion, but also by reducing the tax burden, making it less convenient to use evasion, which has social costs but also real) economy and a slight recovery. It is required to harass citizens with higher taxes when a sufficient structural intervention on public spending? And if you really can not act alone in this sense because the stakes are too many, not least the sacrifice should be required of all apparatus and therefore state? If only for the well-publicized equity.
If the sacrifices go in one direction, then it should be clear to all, with disarming clarity of a dream, both right and left, which requires the clear manifestation of our discontent.
0 comments:
Post a Comment