Light Cm Before Period?

L’incompatibilità tra Stato pesante e meritocrazia

Three articles have impressed me a lot in recent days by amplifying the bitterness that characterizes this period in all my perception of the Italian political scene:

1. Francesco Giavazzi Courier on Sunday, October 29 that talks about the results of a survey according to which, when asked if some would prefer a lower paid job in a more precarious but well-paid, six out of 10 young people today still prefer the security of not having to put in game the risk of having to really confront their own abilities and skills and then with meritocracy, while the prospect of earning more.

2. Giuliano Da Empoli on Reform of Monday, October 30, who says that yes we are witnessing today a phenomenon of youth policy of rapprochement, but this approximation seems to concentrate mainly on the left and look to the past and then reproducing the same patterns of Communist propaganda struggle class, capitalism bad, the working class exploited and uncritical defense of the status quo. Compared to this article believe that it is true that the trend towards rapprochement is catalyzed primarily by the left, look to the past and the defense of own small corporate privilege, perhaps even inherited from his family, is certainly also a shared right.

3. Maurizio Ferrera on Nov. 1 Courier yesterday, which said today as the analysis of modern society through the mere application of sociological categories of class, is not exhaustive, as the company is definitely much more nuanced than the dichotomy bourgeoisie / proletariat, Despite the radical left is so determined to want to anachronistically describe in these terms, also equally anachronistic, is not only the radical left to use those categories, but they are taken up officially by the government in office that with the Budget proposes the dynamics of class struggle with a dubious redistributive policy towards the weaker social classes (not further identified because the budget law itself comes up against the difficulty of identifying unambiguously weak class) and ditching the self in Sometimes it is the most at risk in the famous ability to make ends meet.

cite all three of these articles because I believe together very well describe the Italian reality of today: a vicious circle from which no policy or proposal heard so far, but those of a few white fly, you off. I try to summarize this vicious circle that comes from my perception and that I see more clearly through these articles.

Today's youth, which should also be the future of politics and push for growth, renewal, improvement of social conditions and the spread of wealth, are convinced that it is better to have no ambition for personal growth, no opportunity to compete with themselves, no chance of finding what is the means by which they can implement self-realization. They lost the momentum that is supposed to be typical of their age, and prefer to sail in safe waters, protected from the liquid state Amiot mother who takes care of them and maybe you already gave him, because inherited from the family situation, a corporate privilege of some kind, however slight, they do not want to miss putting in play (without necessarily talking about notaries, doctors, lawyers, pharmacists, and so on, transferring their privilege directly to the children, the son of a worker who somehow feels secure in the hope of having a job like that unless things change for another in certain contexts of law can take over their parents).

But as there has been an almost complete loss of momentum to do and understanding to realize what you really like and is satisfying in a different way each of us?

From my point of view the main cause of the phenomenon described the inability of young people to get involved in the folding and conservatism, is a country too ingombrante.Tale cause becomes effect (and thus the vicious circle) when in fact the phenomenon of lack of responsibility of individuals, produces the need for a State defend the current situation, even if untenable, and take care of them in every aspect of their lives.

A state that is ingested in all spheres of public and private life of citizens crushes individuality and peculiarities of the people who get used to not recognize it in themselves and thus rely totally to the State, a State does not leave heavy room for meritocracy and the people are unaccustomed to seeing the positive effects that can emerge and be satisfied with what we have as individuals and for what we wanted and managed to do, not a heavy state creates opportunities and creates it if only to reward those that the help and support (friends and relatives all) and therefore is incompatible with the ability to access opportunities equally regardless from membership in a social environment only through its own capabilities.

Here, after years of State greedy people in general and youth in particular, are increasingly used to seeing examples of people who have achieved results through any type of meritocracy, but more often through questionable relationships with power, this contributes to widespread dissatisfaction that results in the uncritical rejection of the system in which we live. Since no (or almost) force field provides policy (he has an interest in providing) concrete reform proposals for which this state of things can change and does not propose an analysis of the causes nor the solutions, this refusal is often uncritical exploited by the radical left, thanks to its extensive presence in the territory, is much more successful than the right, to channel them into the stereotype of corrupt capitalism, capitalism panacea of \u200b\u200ball evils and would seek to defend any privilege that is not better identified working class has gained against the master pimp, without thinking that this is unsustainable and certainly not possible to improve the general living conditions. On the other hand I do not think that the right side otherwise, indeed also tend to channel the consensus around the defense of all the privileges acquired by corporations, and then their young children, who look to this part of cultural policy, helping to not shed light on the cause of this lack of aspiration, even and especially in a time when it may have finally awakened to the important role of making a difference.

course, what the current government is doing even more amplifies the effect described the lack of courage to test themselves to understand their own inclinations favor and development: a budget that gives new meaning to the class struggle, officially opposing the bourgeoisie in a poor weak unidentified class of course good in a simplistic categorization of Italian society when most of the major experts does not believe that this facility is more (or ever) to describe the great complexity of today's society means will continue to maintain this situation food and a lack of understanding of reality by the people. It means to create the entitlement to continue to promote a state that occupies of every sphere of our lives.

publicly put to shame and self-employment and small and medium-sized enterprises as it is doing with a deceitful propaganda campaign, this government indicated as evaders then act against the state against the rule of law against the people who live in the illusion that the state is good, does nothing but fuel the desire to entrench in what you have even if it's not, rather than risk to test, especially if then the compensation is to be persecuted as tax evaders or simply fail to survive because thwarted by the state-owner who has a vested interest in not encourage meritocracy. It is here that the cause becomes effect greedy because the state creates the perception of need among the people, who therefore wants it and defends it.

I think the political class today, both right and left, to keep the excessive power of the state apparatus from which they themselves take or have taken innumerable benefits, has every interest in encouraging this kind of defeatist attitude, rather than provide the right analysis of the problem and a solution especially in the libertarian sense. I do not hear any complaints clear that if ever it were possible a clear distinction between the exploited and exploiters, the first and second we'd all those who are pushing for increasing the greed of the state. I feel only very clearly (apart from a few sporadic examples) the will to keep everything as is.

Cancerous Moles Condition_symptoms

Un'altra ipotesi sul perché Prodi continua imperterrito per la sua strada

It seems that the question which I tried to give an answer (although in many ways ironic) in my post from late morning or why Prodi and his ostinino is to declare that all goes well, regardless of the criticism, even when it is shown by the facts beyond a reasonable doubt exactly the opposite, it is increasingly common.

Today on 'Review this same question Diaconal ventured an answer simply by saying that Prodi, a party without her, can afford to pursue their own personal interests, or stay as long as possible to the presidency of the council and in the meantime become indispensable for those who, on account of its decisions has lost consensus (Margaret and DS) will continue to remain in government.

I personally believe that this interpretation is almost less realistic than it might be my this morning in which I argue that Prodi, in reality conbutta with all moderate forces of both the majority and the opposition, seeks the real goal of wiping out the extreme communist by the Italian political scene. But maybe you could create the right presonaggio entrusted with this assignment because of an orphan party his!

I can not see clearly through the report for which the application of a financial preposterous and dangerous, which is losing not only consent to the DS and the Margherita, but he, too, Prodi should do their own interest if the rope pulls too Margherita and DS could still decide to bridge the seams with the opposition and still remain in the government, but this time without him ... and without the Communists.

It will fall in the result for which I assumed would create a coalition to do some cross-cutting reforms necessaire excluding the radical left. Prodi that he is or is not conscious.

Back Osteoarthritis More Condition_symptoms

Come invento il complotto per eliminare l'estrema comunista

I must admit, to hear so much talk of plots to the right and left me infected. From the first Berlusconi, Prodi to now, not to mention international events for which there is always a conspiracy theory that can explain in a more picturesque, and thus more credible, a time when the hype is the bread newspaper, what happened, but I could not resist. During the long weekend spent surrounded by the malaise in the north east of this period and its infamous fog, obscuring any reference point, probably also obscures the rationality of people, I am convinced that, beyond a reasonable doubt, there is a Therefore, however difficult to find, for everything, including Prodi and his cabinet!

It all started after two evenings with two other friends to discuss the current political situation: although the two friends in a matter of right and one left both me and then shared with each other and the analysis (and proceedings bad) about the work of the government so far, and above all the libertarian sense solutions to the problems in the country, in clear contradiction with the choices then Executive.

happy to see how we can be close even if deployed on opposite sides so optimistic on the actual political space that exists in this momento storico per la diffusione e il radicamento di tutto ciò che va nel senso di riduzione del peso dello stato, di liberismo in economia, di libertà di scelta secondo la propria coscienza in ambito civile ed etico, ho scoperto di trovarmi altrettanto d’accordo con loro nel notare quanto fossero in stridente contraddizione le dichiarazioni ufficiali del governo di fronte all’evidenza dei fatti.

Il malcontento diffuso sia da parte dei cittadini che interno alla stessa maggioranza, le critiche di economisti anche dell’area politica di riferimento del governo, il monito del governatore della Banca d’Italia, la sfiducia internazionale nel sistema Italia della stampa e delle Agenzia di Rating che hanno palesato questa sfiducia in a lowering of credit due to the inability of Italy once again to start the engine of development and growth, but also because of the failure recovery with structural reforms, can not conclusively demonstrate to all and thus to Prodi , Padoa-Schioppa and its questionable as to which are certainly not stupid, so conceived that this budget is unnecessary and particularly damaging to the achievement of the goals themselves remain unperturbed state as a priority, equity and development or rehabilitation.

So it does not seem plausible to think that Prodi and TPS continue to support, regardless of the criticism that the budget is fair, that the improvement is achieved with simple cuts and tax increases, that growth can be sustained with an increase in taxation and regulations that are conducive to the intensification of controls by introducing the presumption of innocence (and not so as it would be fair, of innocence) to the citizen by the state, that companies are requiring them to help the transformation of a future debt in a certain and immediate disbursement of real money, belonging to other citizens, and so on .... This is not plausible and then it is clear to me (as it would be consumed for any conspiracy) that there must be some reason not stated that justifies such absurd behavior.

So begins my frantic search for what might be this reason, and as in the formulation of any theory worthy of respect (even those that are not respected as one of the conspiracy) the lighting comes unexpected reading the Courier Sunday: TPS , in a statement at the conference in Frascati Glocus says the middle class should celebrate because of the death of Karl Marx for the first time two parties are convinced of the radical left to accept the responsibility of government is natural that a person who is not accustomed to find evidence of his theory in every section, this statement may seem like just a new absurdity in contradiction with the facts, and instead no, for me my new conspiracy using blindly just cospirazional scientific method, is the proof of why this government insists on a financial support so invisible to all: the elimination of extreme communist Italian political scenario.

So I understand the encrypted message to TPS: the middle class should be happy that the communists are finally to the government because this is the best way to tame and render them harmless (the experience of the secessionist Northern League, which receives much consent north, which becomes a moderate party with its loss of consensus and smoothing of the more radical ideas-although in my opinion quite innovative a differenza di quelle dei comunisti, ma tant’è –durante e dopo l’esperienza di governo dovrebbe insegnare); il ceto medio dovrebbe essere felice che i comunisti abbiano accettato la responsabilità di governo e soprattutto che abbiano contribuito in modo così determinante (e direi quasi esclusivo) alla stesura di questa finanziaria classista che va contro lo sviluppo e che deprime la meritocrazia, perché tale responsabilità nel governo e diretta nella finanziaria farà in modo che, se l’Italia raggiungerà il baratro economico sarà facilmente ravvisabile di chi sia la colpa con conseguente naturale eliminazione del colpevole dalla scena politica italiana.

Ma non è finita qui: dall’alto now my understanding of the facts, I believe that the catastrophic scenario is described, therefore, is unlikely to happen. Deep in the vein of optimism given me the recognition that there is more room for libertarian ideas to the right and left of the images I decide that the most likely scenario for achieving the objective of definitively concluding the communist experience in Italy, shaped by the forces of moderation not only the majority but the opposition (and here's the plot), is one according to which the instrument of "financial communists" created by Prodi and TPS, serves to compact the consensus of a coalition enlarged to promote and apply the common sense libertarian ideas, which is actually the same financial suggest an almost foregone conclusion, so it is detrimental to individual civil and economic liberties and so much class.

Here is revealed the mystery of this apparent contradiction of the 2007 Budget with the real objectives of rehabilitation and development of equity that the government continues to support will be pursued despite empirically proven otherwise. You already have everything planned and designed to achieve the real objective, namely the renewal of political culture in Italy promoting libertarian ideas and eliminating extreme steeped in the financial community has the task of suggesting the antithesis ideas on which it will build the new consensus on the right or left, or liberal and libertarian ideas (later of course between left and right will make the appropriate distinctions, but at least the cultural background must be the same and this sense), the moderate forces will be responsible for channeled into the track. However, if the politicians of both right and left will not be able to drive this signal here is that taking the catastrophic scenario for which the financial steeped in communism and Italy will come to the brink, even in this case the community before responsible for the policies contained in it, will still be pilloried and excluded from the scene politica.

Che ne dite, non è quasi quasi bello pensare che potrebbe davvero essere così? Poi però mi rendo conto che il presupposto dal quale sono partita, ovvero che la contraddizione è evidente perché Prodi e TPS non sono degli incompetenti, in effetti non è poi così realistica e quindi la mia teoria complottista purtroppo crolla.