Cancerous Moles Condition_symptoms

Un'altra ipotesi sul perché Prodi continua imperterrito per la sua strada

It seems that the question which I tried to give an answer (although in many ways ironic) in my post from late morning or why Prodi and his ostinino is to declare that all goes well, regardless of the criticism, even when it is shown by the facts beyond a reasonable doubt exactly the opposite, it is increasingly common.

Today on 'Review this same question Diaconal ventured an answer simply by saying that Prodi, a party without her, can afford to pursue their own personal interests, or stay as long as possible to the presidency of the council and in the meantime become indispensable for those who, on account of its decisions has lost consensus (Margaret and DS) will continue to remain in government.

I personally believe that this interpretation is almost less realistic than it might be my this morning in which I argue that Prodi, in reality conbutta with all moderate forces of both the majority and the opposition, seeks the real goal of wiping out the extreme communist by the Italian political scene. But maybe you could create the right presonaggio entrusted with this assignment because of an orphan party his!

I can not see clearly through the report for which the application of a financial preposterous and dangerous, which is losing not only consent to the DS and the Margherita, but he, too, Prodi should do their own interest if the rope pulls too Margherita and DS could still decide to bridge the seams with the opposition and still remain in the government, but this time without him ... and without the Communists.

It will fall in the result for which I assumed would create a coalition to do some cross-cutting reforms necessaire excluding the radical left. Prodi that he is or is not conscious.

Back Osteoarthritis More Condition_symptoms

Come invento il complotto per eliminare l'estrema comunista

I must admit, to hear so much talk of plots to the right and left me infected. From the first Berlusconi, Prodi to now, not to mention international events for which there is always a conspiracy theory that can explain in a more picturesque, and thus more credible, a time when the hype is the bread newspaper, what happened, but I could not resist. During the long weekend spent surrounded by the malaise in the north east of this period and its infamous fog, obscuring any reference point, probably also obscures the rationality of people, I am convinced that, beyond a reasonable doubt, there is a Therefore, however difficult to find, for everything, including Prodi and his cabinet!

It all started after two evenings with two other friends to discuss the current political situation: although the two friends in a matter of right and one left both me and then shared with each other and the analysis (and proceedings bad) about the work of the government so far, and above all the libertarian sense solutions to the problems in the country, in clear contradiction with the choices then Executive.

happy to see how we can be close even if deployed on opposite sides so optimistic on the actual political space that exists in this momento storico per la diffusione e il radicamento di tutto ciò che va nel senso di riduzione del peso dello stato, di liberismo in economia, di libertà di scelta secondo la propria coscienza in ambito civile ed etico, ho scoperto di trovarmi altrettanto d’accordo con loro nel notare quanto fossero in stridente contraddizione le dichiarazioni ufficiali del governo di fronte all’evidenza dei fatti.

Il malcontento diffuso sia da parte dei cittadini che interno alla stessa maggioranza, le critiche di economisti anche dell’area politica di riferimento del governo, il monito del governatore della Banca d’Italia, la sfiducia internazionale nel sistema Italia della stampa e delle Agenzia di Rating che hanno palesato questa sfiducia in a lowering of credit due to the inability of Italy once again to start the engine of development and growth, but also because of the failure recovery with structural reforms, can not conclusively demonstrate to all and thus to Prodi , Padoa-Schioppa and its questionable as to which are certainly not stupid, so conceived that this budget is unnecessary and particularly damaging to the achievement of the goals themselves remain unperturbed state as a priority, equity and development or rehabilitation.

So it does not seem plausible to think that Prodi and TPS continue to support, regardless of the criticism that the budget is fair, that the improvement is achieved with simple cuts and tax increases, that growth can be sustained with an increase in taxation and regulations that are conducive to the intensification of controls by introducing the presumption of innocence (and not so as it would be fair, of innocence) to the citizen by the state, that companies are requiring them to help the transformation of a future debt in a certain and immediate disbursement of real money, belonging to other citizens, and so on .... This is not plausible and then it is clear to me (as it would be consumed for any conspiracy) that there must be some reason not stated that justifies such absurd behavior.

So begins my frantic search for what might be this reason, and as in the formulation of any theory worthy of respect (even those that are not respected as one of the conspiracy) the lighting comes unexpected reading the Courier Sunday: TPS , in a statement at the conference in Frascati Glocus says the middle class should celebrate because of the death of Karl Marx for the first time two parties are convinced of the radical left to accept the responsibility of government is natural that a person who is not accustomed to find evidence of his theory in every section, this statement may seem like just a new absurdity in contradiction with the facts, and instead no, for me my new conspiracy using blindly just cospirazional scientific method, is the proof of why this government insists on a financial support so invisible to all: the elimination of extreme communist Italian political scenario.

So I understand the encrypted message to TPS: the middle class should be happy that the communists are finally to the government because this is the best way to tame and render them harmless (the experience of the secessionist Northern League, which receives much consent north, which becomes a moderate party with its loss of consensus and smoothing of the more radical ideas-although in my opinion quite innovative a differenza di quelle dei comunisti, ma tant’è –durante e dopo l’esperienza di governo dovrebbe insegnare); il ceto medio dovrebbe essere felice che i comunisti abbiano accettato la responsabilità di governo e soprattutto che abbiano contribuito in modo così determinante (e direi quasi esclusivo) alla stesura di questa finanziaria classista che va contro lo sviluppo e che deprime la meritocrazia, perché tale responsabilità nel governo e diretta nella finanziaria farà in modo che, se l’Italia raggiungerà il baratro economico sarà facilmente ravvisabile di chi sia la colpa con conseguente naturale eliminazione del colpevole dalla scena politica italiana.

Ma non è finita qui: dall’alto now my understanding of the facts, I believe that the catastrophic scenario is described, therefore, is unlikely to happen. Deep in the vein of optimism given me the recognition that there is more room for libertarian ideas to the right and left of the images I decide that the most likely scenario for achieving the objective of definitively concluding the communist experience in Italy, shaped by the forces of moderation not only the majority but the opposition (and here's the plot), is one according to which the instrument of "financial communists" created by Prodi and TPS, serves to compact the consensus of a coalition enlarged to promote and apply the common sense libertarian ideas, which is actually the same financial suggest an almost foregone conclusion, so it is detrimental to individual civil and economic liberties and so much class.

Here is revealed the mystery of this apparent contradiction of the 2007 Budget with the real objectives of rehabilitation and development of equity that the government continues to support will be pursued despite empirically proven otherwise. You already have everything planned and designed to achieve the real objective, namely the renewal of political culture in Italy promoting libertarian ideas and eliminating extreme steeped in the financial community has the task of suggesting the antithesis ideas on which it will build the new consensus on the right or left, or liberal and libertarian ideas (later of course between left and right will make the appropriate distinctions, but at least the cultural background must be the same and this sense), the moderate forces will be responsible for channeled into the track. However, if the politicians of both right and left will not be able to drive this signal here is that taking the catastrophic scenario for which the financial steeped in communism and Italy will come to the brink, even in this case the community before responsible for the policies contained in it, will still be pilloried and excluded from the scene politica.

Che ne dite, non è quasi quasi bello pensare che potrebbe davvero essere così? Poi però mi rendo conto che il presupposto dal quale sono partita, ovvero che la contraddizione è evidente perché Prodi e TPS non sono degli incompetenti, in effetti non è poi così realistica e quindi la mia teoria complottista purtroppo crolla.

Phone Network Lock Calculator

Giampaolo Pansa e Harry Wu: due evidenze di come funziona l’ideologia comunista

Come un mese fa, anche oggi una bella notizia su quanto è liberale la sinistra radicale. Giampaolo Pansa, antifascista e storico della Resistenza, presentava ieri a Reggio Emilia il suo ultimo libro “La grande bugia”; un mese fa, Harry Wu, scrittore scappato dalla Cina dopo 19 anni di agonia nei campo di concentramento, presented in Rome (San Lorenzo), the Italian translation (15 years after the publication of that book in America!) of his free "Laogai: the Chinese gulag" in both cases, the radical left has prevented the normal course of lectures using the usual methods illiberal that distinguishes it: the el'impedimento violent dispute with the power of freedom of expression, fuck your opinion if it is not organic to 'communist ideology.

A month ago, Harry Wu has to go in an get rid of San Lorenzo to present his book, but is warned in advance that some unidentified members of the radical left has been thrown against those who were present for the presentation, kicking and beating those who can not escape. The police, who intervened too late, can not put anyone in custody.

Yesterday Pansa was seen arriving at the conference in Reggio Emilia for the presentation of his latest book, the usual radical leftists with their aggressive behavior has prevented the continuation of the conference. The situation required the intervention of the police who have vacated the room.

so absurd But what they say about these two writers in their books do not even deserve to be spoken aloud in front of a audience interested in listening? The mystery is revealed: these two people (who, as such, however, deserve to be able to freely express their ideas in front of interested parties), but through experiences totally different challenge in any way to communism.

Wu's experience calls into question, that's incredible, even the Communist Chinese regime that tramples human rights in every way and even uses concentration camps for dissidents who are declared (even if, in fact, for have expressed their own views critical of the regime, recalls the same methods as in San Lorenzo is not it?-or want to exercise freedom, per noi scontata, di culto come nel caso di Wu).

L’esperienza di Pansa invece, si permette di mettere in discussione l’intoccabile storia della resistenza italiana che pare appartenere soltanto ai comunisti, mostrando, guarda un po’, che l’antifascismo è stato esperienza plurale di quanti (liberali, democratici, repubblicani, persino monarchici,ma comunque lontani dall’esperienza comunista) abbiano difeso la libertà, anche in contrasto proprio con i comunisti che –e qui davvero Pansa si spinge troppo, troppo oltre perché i compagni estremisti possano tollerare di lasciarlo parlare –utilizzando la resistenza antifascista come base della rivoluzione, tentarono to replace the fascist regime with the Communist regime committing acts of violence against those who hoped to get rid of a dictatorship, certainly not to replace it with another.

It's really sad to see that there are still people in the name of communist ideology go to these levels of intolerance by trampling the freedoms that should be entrenched in our society, it is sad to realize how, again, party propaganda can blind people and completely anesthetize any kind of free thinking and openness to knowledge other than accrued up to that point.

The lack, or even il rifiuto di ogni confronto perché si è convinti di detenere la verità assoluta, semplicemente tacciando di fascismo qualsiasi cosa vada contro l’ordine delle cose che ci è stato inculcata, non è certamente segno di superiorità antropologica o morale che sia, bensì di intolleranza, chiusura mentale o paura. L'unica certezza è che, qualunque sia il motivo del rifiuto del confronto, il risultato che si vorrà ottenere sarà sempre quello di cercare di reprimere quanto più possibile gli spazi per l'esercizio della libertà di opinione di chi non la pensa come noi.

E ritengo che il fatto che notizie del genere non vengano gridate dalla stampa (nelle testate online di oggi solo il Corriere riporta la notizia per Pansa e un mese fa solo la Padania e qualche giorno dopo Libero, hanno riportato la notizia per Wu), dimostra semplicemente, se ce ne fosse ancora bisogno, che purtroppo in Italia il fascismo (ops! comunismo) è ancora diffuso.