After the Pope's statement of yesterday "is an emergency job insecurity and social ethics," is definitely clear which political party has won the whole of the Vatican. From left
maximalist chorus of cheers coming to the Pope and his newfound vision and intelligence, so that the far-left newspapers dare even that red thing is directly invested by God
maximalist chorus of cheers coming to the Pope and his newfound vision and intelligence, so that the far-left newspapers dare even that red thing is directly invested by God
And who can blame them : If the Pope represents God on earth, and the Pope agrees to left ceiling for the transitive property ....
But apart from the usual hypocrisy of the left which not worth to dwell, what I do not like it at all is the fact that a person who is somehow an institutional figure that lived some years in a state where the argument of flexibility (or uncertainty as the saying goes maximalist left and now the pope perfectly aligned) labor reforms introduced by the Treu and Biagi following is so delicate and debated as to have caused death and violence to be unleashed today, to intervene in this debate so lightly just fueling the violent component of the debate. Can I come to understand that a pope to intervene on ethical issues that are the foundation of the Catholic faith (the defense of life in all its forms for example), but also that sudden "economist" and speak about such delicate topics without understanding anything I really do not go down.
Even more disturbing is to see that everything is still right, no comment on these words, bombs even by those who try to pimp always making choices too unrealistic to achieve this goal. ... When we wake up instead of focusing on getting the placet from the church on the real problems and on a line that takes us on the road of "liberalism" is not it?
more so in the light of these statements, which show a church that looks to the left and a puppet in the hands of Pope-powerful church hierarchy, probably lean towards positions close to the theology of liberation.
But apart from the usual hypocrisy of the left which not worth to dwell, what I do not like it at all is the fact that a person who is somehow an institutional figure that lived some years in a state where the argument of flexibility (or uncertainty as the saying goes maximalist left and now the pope perfectly aligned) labor reforms introduced by the Treu and Biagi following is so delicate and debated as to have caused death and violence to be unleashed today, to intervene in this debate so lightly just fueling the violent component of the debate. Can I come to understand that a pope to intervene on ethical issues that are the foundation of the Catholic faith (the defense of life in all its forms for example), but also that sudden "economist" and speak about such delicate topics without understanding anything I really do not go down.
Even more disturbing is to see that everything is still right, no comment on these words, bombs even by those who try to pimp always making choices too unrealistic to achieve this goal. ... When we wake up instead of focusing on getting the placet from the church on the real problems and on a line that takes us on the road of "liberalism" is not it?
more so in the light of these statements, which show a church that looks to the left and a puppet in the hands of Pope-powerful church hierarchy, probably lean towards positions close to the theology of liberation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment