Patches Of Blood In Stool

Fiat ultima?

From a friend, we receive and gladly posted:

all know who is Romano Prodi. The man who is born politically in the first Republic degeneration and is continuing with the same rules in the second. Of course we can not say it is not tough and ambitious and this will undoubtedly be acknowledged.
This man has even managed to "recycle" in the eyes of the electorate to the left like a new man when in fact part of the establishment Italian at least 30 years . Above all, I like to remember him in the top of the IRI bandwagon or its "amazing" privatizations such as that of Telecom (seeing as we're going to end), or the privatization of the Italian By putting in stock shares less than their market value , or sale - to a mysterious financial Lucana - of Cirio-Bertolli-De Rica , or the sale of SME to De Benedetti at a price that was not there in heaven and on earth. I'd have to say until tomorrow morning, but I have no time. But I want to close this beautiful moment "historic" about entrepreneurial skills of the Professor with "gem" of the sale of Alfa Romeo to Fiat . Alfa lost hundreds of billions each year . Yet a car like the Ford advanced interest in the car given the prestigious brand that was famous among other things the United States. In short, the American carmaker advanced very interesting offer for the time: well 3.3 trillion. The project was clear to Ford that would take full control of Alpha by eight years with a business plan that included an investment plan of 4.2 trillion for the years following the purchase mainly with extensive guarantees for employees. The offer was formalized. Meanwhile, however, Romano Prodi informed Cesare Romiti (see the case) the future supply and Fiat did not fail, of course, also make their own: the purchase price of 1.7 trillion (half of what Ford offered) , without interest in five installments, the first installment in 1993, then 5,000 billion in investments by 1995. You know all those who then sold it with the excuse Prodi Italianness! Eventually, over the years, were entered into agreements with unions that led Alfa - Including redundancy, resignation, dismissal and early retirement - from 1,023 to 20,000 employees. you're wondering, "Well you told us all these things, but why?" First to let you know who sits today at Palazzo Chigi, and second because a few minutes ago was handed to me by e-mail this link , where I found the same procedures and the same recipes that are typical of Professor who knows how to do these things. And 'while Epifani ago "Toto" on "ass" of the government (which hypocrisy gentlemen) we have returned back incredibly well 20 years power with policies, welfare, illiberali,stataliste e che non tengono conto dello sviluppo del paese . Ricette che non porteranno a nulla se non a rinvangare un passato fatto di guai basato su fondamenta di argilla.
Se non c'è da arrabbiarsi ditemelo voi.

A rileggerci.

[Fonte per i dati dell'offerta Fiat-Alfa: Pietro Ichino "A che cosa serve un sindacato" Ed.Mondadori 2005]

Salvage Motorcycles Ontario

Ma perché in queste situazioni viene sempre fuori il peggio della destra?

Ma è mai possibile che con tanti e tali motivi per contestare Prodi e il suo governo (più tasse per tutti, difesa ad oltranza degli interessi di coloro che lo supportano, menzogne palesi su qualsiasi argomento, inadeguatezza politica su ogni fronte; incapacità persino to act positively and structurally in the only goal that is shared to help the weaker) the right to contest it, and then manages to have a space on the front page of Corriere online, is that which is against him for pacs ?

But is it possible that we continue to pay handsomely for those who want to paint the side of his right hand only and exclusively as a pool of intolerant and unable to be bearers of freedom of choice of individuals in the private sphere?

It is possible that instead of challenging the state interference even on the personal choices of individuals proposed by this majority of left through the PACS, which is nothing more but a proliferation of laws that certainly does not make us free (however, let me say that personally, rather than put down roots in a situation right now I prefer pacs), you can not oppose a policy that defends the true individual freedom to dispose of their property and acquired rights as you see fit free by signing contracts between the parties (and thus finally bring the defense of the sacred will of homosexuals and not only them, to decide who will side in hospital , to decide who to their pensions, or their heritage, etc ...) rather than introducing new legal institutions that would lend themselves to bad one thousand personal needs and to the thousands of individual cases?

Is it possible that it is so stupid to say no to pacs entrenching positions anachronistic by the figure of the intolerant when it would be enough to propose laws for freedom instead deal with that 'problem' which, for some areas of both right and left (where naturl can not recognize), is gay marriage? Furthermore if you think that even the current government is doing that much to do in the way of pacs still only talking about the same and thus giving the appearance of interest (since there is no agreement in the majority) where if you really wanted it office space to do so without changing anything in practice there would already?!?!

Malignant Brain Tumor More Condition_symptoms

Nicola Rossi: Un Vero Riformista

Definitely interesting that today Nicola Rossi writes Corriere : detailed reasons and certainly shared by people like me who hopes to force the creation of a truly modern, liberal left, which is finally free of the sinker Communist for its decision to abandon the DS.

course it's a really bad, very bad sign that he, one of the (few) par excellence reformist left, go away from DS for a long time ... as we say, left, unfortunately, at this historical moment there seems to be space for reform, but only for the unbearable, outdated, useless and harmful soparattutto radical left, which instead continues to grow.

Bravo Rossi, approve of the choice (not yours too), in the hope that it serves the reformist left (if it really exists) to finally take a specific way, painful but necessary, distinction from the Communist left.

Unfortunately I have little doubt that serve in some way ... D'Alema seems even more committed to maintaining its position, which is of very low profile (and I am amazed by the sharing regardless of his political ideas) rather than promote action, maybe even risky but certainly courageous, giving voice and space only to ideas that could save the defeat of DS and Margherita in this awful government.

What a disappointment that left today!